|
The European chemical industry is one of the few branches of manufacturing where Europe still plays
the prime role in the world. If society and governments give it the support it needs, it will
continue to meet the expectations of our citizens for better housing, transport, communications,
health and leisure. This will require a commitment to education and better public communications,
especially directed at young people, to ensure that the best brains of the next century are attracted
to careers in chemistry and chemical engineering.
In the following paragraphs we say something about the current state of our industry, what it offers
and what governments can do to help.
European assets
The European chemical industry contributes more than 30 billion ecu to the trade balance; its
turnover amounts to almost 1000 ecu per person in Europe. This commercial success enables it to be a
major source of income to people and taxes to governments, as well as meeting the cost of its own
capital investment in new technologies, funding research and planning development. All of this occurs
within the constraints of environmental protection and safety and, although the early years of this
century saw chemical plant disasters and unacceptable levels of pollution, the chemical industry of
today has a safety record of which it can be proud.
The chemical industry has always needed a high level of research and development, and 5% of its
turnover is invested this way. Pharmaceutical companies invest up to 22%. The total research and
technological development (R&TD) bill comes to around 20 billion ecu, a sum equal to the profits of
the entire industry, showing its commitment to innovation. This investment is needed because the
development of a new pharmaceutical drug requires about 300,000,000 ecu and a new plant-protection
agent about 200,000,000 ecu. The industry shoulders these expenses as part of the commercial risks
it has to take. Such investments will continue.
Employment
The European chemical industry comprises over 30,000 companies, 98% of which are small and
medium-sized enterprises employing fewer than 500 people. The other 2% comprise some of the largest
companies in the world. Indeed, six of the world's top 10 chemical companies are based in Europe. In
all, the industry directly employs 1.65 million people, while many times this number work in other
economic sectors which depend directly on its products. An even greater number depend indirectly on
the wealth and taxes which it generates. Were these jobs to be lost it would be equivalent to putting
out of work the entire population of a medium-sized member state, joining the nearly 20 million other
EU citizens who are already unemployed.
The future
The European chemical industry can continue to flourish and improve, but only if it has the right
conditions. These can be summed up as follows:
 |
excellent scientific and
educational facilities |
 |
strong and continuous support from public funds for exploratory research in the strategic domain and for technology developments in areas of strong social need |
 |
public acceptance of scientific goals and a willingness to accept new technologies and products |
 |
science-based and realistic legal requirements and guidelines |
Governments levying taxes on the industry will doubtless recognise its need to remain profitable and
to finance future developments. In the global marketplace, however, the time from invention to
delivery of a new product is getting shorter and shorter. The need for regulatory controls based on
good science and appropriate consultation is accepted. Should the development, testing and pilot
plant production of a new chemical product be unnecessarily slowed down by misguided regulation, the
process becomes uncompetitive and beneficial new products are lost. This could lead to international
chemical companies making their investments outside Europe.
Europe has been a major driving force for progress for over 150 years. If this is to continue, the
public must welcome the benefits of chemical innovation; for example, viewing the construction of new
plants as a source of jobs and enlightened employment. There is a clear need for wider public
education in the risks and benefits of innovation.
The chemical industry is not asking for subsidies or special legislative exemptions, but for better
appreciation of what our science offers and a better understanding of what constitutes reasonable
risk. We want to see more effective interaction between scientists and industrialists on the one
hand, and politicians and those in the media on the other, to set a new agenda for communicating with
the general public, so that they are better briefed about the issues facing us all and the benefits
that a vigorous chemical industry can bring. There are exciting times ahead with new challenges in
chemistry, especially where it overlaps with other sciences, with remarkable innovation in chemical
engineering helping to deliver new products and improving health.
Europe has a major asset in its science and education base. This now needs to be strengthened. The
benefits of doing this are demonstrated in the research initiatives that are reported in later pages
of this report.
|